I couldn't sleep and so at 3:42 I decided I may as well work on my Soci class' Internet Assignment. Here it is, because, you know, I get all these freaking Google hits on tentacle hentai and maybe it would be more useful if I got hits from people trying to end violence against women. I need to rework some awkward sentences, but here's my draft...
Internet Assignment Three
Circe Smith
For this assignment, I chose
Chapter 9 and the United State Department of Justice's Office of Violence
Against Women <http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/vawo/>.
In Thinking
About Women, Chapter 9 states, "Explanations of violence against women have
usually suggested that its cause lies within the personalities and social
backgrounds of individuals who commit violence, but the empirical data on women
as victims indicates that the cause of violence lies not in the characteristics
of offenders but in the social status of their victims. This is not to say that
women are responsible for the violence committed against them. Quite the
opposite; it locates the causes of violence within the political and economic
status of women in society" (
Women are the victims of crimes because they are women in a society consistently marginalizing and devaluing them on the basis of their gender. Women are victims because of the imbalance of power between the sexes. In nearly all global societies, the inferior status attached to women results in injury, intimidation, physical and emotional abuse towards women based solely upon the fact that they are women and as such deemed inferior. When you hold a group of people as substandard, as lesser, you implicitly consent to violence against this group. When women are targeted as a group based on their sex, this is a hate crime. The Department of Justice, tacitly aware of this fact, has created a division and a website to specifically address violence against women.
"The mission of the Office on Violence Against Women
(OVW) is to provide federal leadership to reduce violence against women, and to
administer justice for and strengthen services to all victims of domestic
violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. This is accomplished
by developing and supporting the capacity of state, local, tribal, and
non-profit entities involved in responding to violence against women" < http://www.ovw.usdoj.gov/mission.htm>
The site contains information and resources
relating to many areas in which women are exposed to violence. This includes
stalking, domestic violence, and sexual assault. Phone numbers are provided as
well as the definitions of these acts of criminal violence. There are referrals
to publications and research regarding violence against women. Addressing the
high rate of violence against Native American women, there is a section called
Safety for Indian Women.![]()
I was particularly interested to find
information pertaining to the Violence Against Women Act which was enacted to
better prosecute offenders, help victims, and ultimately to halt the trend in
violence perpetuated against women. Prior to this act of 1994, crime and
violence against women were as trivialized, as marginalized, as women were
themselves. This act officially recognized that crime against women is an issue
of overwhelming significance within our
Reading Chapter 9 and visiting the OVM site,
I wonder what it means to live in a world where slightly more than half our
population is female and this percentage of the population is so routinely
victimized that the United states must enact legislation in an attempt to deal
with this violence.
While women are still less likely to be
victimized than men, women are predominantly the victims of violence by men and the overwhelming proportion
of this violence is perpetuated upon women by those familiar to them. I wonder
what this means as well. Women are not safe within society and they are
particularly not safe within their own families and homes?
I particularly wonder what it means that I
myself was the victim of domestic abuse during my first marriage back in Eighty-eight.
I look back and try to understand how I could have felt that it was somehow...
normal. I thought that the physical and emotional abuse was not "too bad," even
as I covered my bruises and tried to hide the reality of my marriage.
I remember feeling embarrassed, embarrassed
that someone would find out. It seemed to me back then that to have someone
discover the fact that I "let" myself be beaten was worse than the fact of my
abuse. I isolated myself because of this, isolated myself even more than my
husband kept me isolated.
I think that if I felt that it was harder to
tell someone than it was for me to ultimately leave, then other women must
surely feel the same. I'm thinking that if it was so hard for me to define
myself as abused, as the victim of violence, it must be similarly difficult for
others. The OVW website provides very clear definitions of violence and I think
that sometimes a woman has to see her personal pain set out in a clear font to
realize that she is being victimized, the victimization is happening to other
women as well, she is not alone, and that there are laws in place to combat
this crime.



According to a recent Harvard study, women between the ages of 18 and 28 physically abuse their intimate partners more frequently than men.
Here's a link to the study.
http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/42/15/31-a
According to the New Jersey Law Journal, Judge Richard Russell of Ocean City, NJ made the following statement regarding restraining orders:
"Your job is not to become concerned about the constitutional rights of the man that you're violating as you grant a restraining order," he said. "Throw him out on the street, give him the clothes on his back and tell him, see ya around ...The woman needs this protection because the statute granted her that protection ... They have declared domestic violence to be an evil in our society. So we don't have to worry about the rights."
A New Mexico judge granted a restraining order against David Letterman based on a woman's claim that Letterman was harassing her with subliminal messages in his television appearances. As a result of the Violence Against Women Act and current domestic violence policy, the judicial oversight in this case amounted to verification that the form was filled out properly with no consideration of the veracity of the claims. This type of judicial oversight is practiced in many states and frequently results in innocent men losing all or most of their meaningful involvement in their children's lives.
It's well known within the legal community that false allegations of domestic violence result in the issuance of hundreds of thousands of restraining orders every year in America. I hope you have the wisdom to understand the system of human incentives that has allowed this situation to come about.
You're insane, right?
Here is a link to 200 more studies indicating similar results regarding the rates at which women engage in violence against their male intimate partners.
www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
Also, women are vastly more likely to abuse, neglect and kill their children than are men. Here are some of the pertinent facts from the US Department of Justice.
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm04/figure4_2.htm
I think you've answered my last question.
***
Umm, I feel compelled to point out that you arrived at my site through a search for "hentai violence"
Here are two links to pdf's of the New Jersey Law Journal article describing how Judge Richard Russell instructed other judges (on tape) not to worry about the rights of men who are accused of domestic violence.
http://www.fathersandhusbands.org/NJ_Rights_1.pdf
http://www.fathersandhusbands.org/NJ_Rights_2.pdf
Here's a link to a BBC article about the issuance of a restraining order against David Letterman based on the absurd allegations of a New Mexico woman. Judge Daniel Sanches, the judge that issued the restraining order, was responsible for judicial policies on restraining orders for all of northern New Mexico.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4563212.stm
Why do you think these things happen?
You state that I arrived at your site through a search for "hentai violence". That is a false accusation. I don't even know what hentai violence is.
I arrived at your site through a google alert email based on the search terms "Romney" and "VAWA". Every time anything goes up on the web that includes the terms "Romney" and "VAWA" I get an email.
So, when you made the absurd suggestion that Romney and the Mormon Church would put a hit on you and you referred VAWA, I got an email.
Why? I blame tentacle hentai.
You're right. It wasn't "hentai violence," it was "henti violence."
1 minute 32 seconds
Page Views 2
Referring URL http://aolsearch.aol...uery=henti violence
Search Engine aolsearch.aol.com
Search Words henti violence
Visit Entry Page http://moronosphere....with-the-tentacl.php
Visit Exit Page http://moronosphere....with-the-tentacl.php
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Jul 6 2008 7:39:23 pm
You're lying.
Site meters don't lie.
By the way, I'm finished publishing your comments. I think you're completely insane and I don't have time for this. (I've got a thesis to write on male violence.)
Some people really need to grow a sense of humor ;)